in my story, canon fires cannonballs
Oct. 17th, 2007 04:45 pmHow much do I want to avoid work today? So very, very much. Instead, I will talk about writing.
traveller made this post about her problems with the term "jossed," and at first it didn't strike me, but now that I think about it, I have noticed a lot of people I know worrying about going off-canon, and needing their stories to match canon at the time of posting, rather than canon at the time they started writing. Or deciding that they can't write a story any more, because it has been contradicted by canon.
I am not sure that I get that. Sure, some stories can fit seamlessly into canon, but not all of them will. There are lots of good stories which change canon: they involve new characters, they resolve ongoing issues, they move the characters forward so significantly that they can't be fit back into the canon universe. I like it when stories do that. I like it when a story shifts the emphasis slightly, so that the canon looks a little different when you're done with it. I don't mind if a story breaks off from canon at a specific point, especially when an author is dealing with an open canon, and a quickly-moving one.
And yet
traveller's intro set a couple of my alarm bells ringing:
The thing is, I am in it for the story, and that includes the canon story as well as the fanfic story. To my ears, "that thing never happened" is all too often code for "I as an author do not really care about the canon story, and also, I am tired of my beta-readers asking me whether Krycek is levitating in that sex scene, or what." It sounds to me like the author is cutting corners, even though I know that's not always the case. Whereas, "we break away from canon here," means to me, "I care about canon logic, but I care about the logic of my story, too." It's a reassurance, rather than a warning; it tells me that the author has thought about the canon, and the way her story fits into the canon, and decided to follow her story. I love canon, but there's nothing wrong with leaving it behind for a little while: it'll still be there when you get back.
ETA: Perhaps this wasn't clear the first time around, but I do agree with
traveller's larger point -- that I don't really get the insistence of judging a story by later canon, or really, in worrying too much about departing from it, if that's what the story needs. The Krycek thing is a throwaway, but it's a throwaway I tend to fixate on.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I am not sure that I get that. Sure, some stories can fit seamlessly into canon, but not all of them will. There are lots of good stories which change canon: they involve new characters, they resolve ongoing issues, they move the characters forward so significantly that they can't be fit back into the canon universe. I like it when stories do that. I like it when a story shifts the emphasis slightly, so that the canon looks a little different when you're done with it. I don't mind if a story breaks off from canon at a specific point, especially when an author is dealing with an open canon, and a quickly-moving one.
And yet
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
back in 'Nam, we used to just put a line in the author's note. for the purposes of this story, Krycek has both arms. or, I'm considering events through last season's finale but nothing further. or, in this story, the thing with the thing never happened. I don't know if people complained to other writers; they didn't say anything to me. but lately? I get the impression from a lot of people that if a story is at any time contradicted by canon, it becomes worthless. or worth less, anyway.
The thing is, I am in it for the story, and that includes the canon story as well as the fanfic story. To my ears, "that thing never happened" is all too often code for "I as an author do not really care about the canon story, and also, I am tired of my beta-readers asking me whether Krycek is levitating in that sex scene, or what." It sounds to me like the author is cutting corners, even though I know that's not always the case. Whereas, "we break away from canon here," means to me, "I care about canon logic, but I care about the logic of my story, too." It's a reassurance, rather than a warning; it tells me that the author has thought about the canon, and the way her story fits into the canon, and decided to follow her story. I love canon, but there's nothing wrong with leaving it behind for a little while: it'll still be there when you get back.
ETA: Perhaps this wasn't clear the first time around, but I do agree with
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)