just saying what everyone else is
May. 19th, 2008 05:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's nice not to feel completely out of step with the fandom re: Dean and his misogynist language; as everyone has pointed out,
trollprincess did the math and there's a distinct upswing in the number of times Dean and Sam use pejoratives when addressing women -- from 3 times over 22 episodes to 18 times over 16. So it's not surprising that by the time I got to the end of the season I was more or less unmoved by Dean's suffering.
What I like best, though, are the excuses for it -- which range from "blame CW!" to "that's not sexist!" to "they deserve it!" to "it's because of the fangirls!" But my absolute favorite, so far, has to be "It's all John's fault!" (
cereta's whole post there is worth reading, as are the comments). Because although indeed it is theoretically possible that John was a sexist asshole, the textual evidence we have does not support it. I am so tempted to go all teal deery about this! Because sure, Missouri and Ellen (and probably Mary) would totally have put up with that.
Unless calling Kate-the-vampire "sweetheart" counts in this context, of course.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
What I like best, though, are the excuses for it -- which range from "blame CW!" to "that's not sexist!" to "they deserve it!" to "it's because of the fangirls!" But my absolute favorite, so far, has to be "It's all John's fault!" (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Unless calling Kate-the-vampire "sweetheart" counts in this context, of course.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 02:11 am (UTC)I truly worry that what we see on the screen is a reflection of what the writers think we want, based on the chatter they read on their message boards.
And I remember Kripke wondering where all the X-Files fans were, why they weren't watching his show, and wondering what that show had that his show doesn't. And I though, how dumb can you be? It had Dana Scully. Competent, respected, and needed. Half the universe is female. But Kripke never did the math.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 03:51 am (UTC)::jaw drops::
He didn't. REALLY? Because dude, that's just dumb.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 11:29 am (UTC)I find the extent to which the showrunners don't understand that they're driving fans like you and me away very frustrating -- almost as frustrating as the thought that they may well know exactly what they're doing.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 11:50 am (UTC)And I agree that there is less fic that grips me as the newer portrayals muddy the waters.
I think SCC and Bones may make it easier for me to let go of the fandom. I actually have shows that I like a lot now, with interesting interactions in which women play a key role. And a lot of my friends seem to be catching one or the other bandwagon, so it may be time to move on.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 06:06 pm (UTC)Yow. It's not like X-Files didn't have gender issues all over the place, but in terms of both Scully and various supporting and one shot females, it was miles and miles above the misogyny of SPN.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 01:46 am (UTC)ETA: and Sydney Bristow!