vaznetti: (lost in the wash)
So, true story: I changed my facebook password because of the heartbeat thing, and now I have no idea what it is. But I wanted to post these pictures, so I did it on tumblr instead (I also changed that password, but I used a less important one which I've managed to remember.)

Pharoah, afflicted by the plague of frogs, or How I Am Everything Wrong with Passover.

(We had a very good set of seders this year, though: Spartacus is now old enough to be interested and pay attention and participate. So happy Passover, belatedly, for real.)
vaznetti: (iustitia)
You know, I don't mean for this journal to be all-religion, all the time. Soon I will get back to talking about all the cool television I have been watching. I mean, did anyone else see Women's Murder Club on Friday night? I really liked it, and although it will never be a great fannish staple, I can see it being the kind of procedural that settles down for that stay-at-home Friday audience for years and years.

[livejournal.com profile] elishavah has posted a wonderful piece on invisibility, and the ways in which we can collude in it and work against it.

I want to link as well to a post from the non-Jewish perspective, although I think it's probably true for anyone who finds herself or himself in the majority: [livejournal.com profile] lenadances writes about what it's like to have a bodyguard in the playground with you.

I feel very strongly that I don't have a particularly privileged view of the workings of prejudice -- for most of my life I've had the luxury of being able to ignore what is different from me, and the extent to which this is still true was brought home to me by [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink's post on common and hidden knowledge. Because obviously, I knew the answers to the questions there, but then I followed the link to [livejournal.com profile] oyceter's original post on the subject: I couldn't answer any of the questions to do with African history, and had only the vaguest sense of the answers to the questions on Chinese history. And it's not that I'm stupid, or poorly educated: it's simply that I've never needed to know these things. And I think this is true of all of us, all the time. It can be scary to admit that there's so much that we don't know, but I think keeping that in the front of our minds can only be good for us.

I'm sure there's a lot more out there, but these posts really struck me.

ETA: You know, this is not the weekend for me to go looking at friends of friends. Seriously. I should know better.
vaznetti: (bang bang)
One of the reasons I've been disturbed by the response to the post [livejournal.com profile] mamadeb made about the timing of the [livejournal.com profile] yuletide sign-ups is that it was exactly the kind of passive-aggressive, whiny, why-isn't-this-all-about-me? post I might make myself, if not on that precise topic. The response, frankly, seemed disproportionate to the content.

The other is... OK, that was how many days ago? Not all that many. And since then, there's been a certain amount of comment on the subject, some of it using words like "entitlement" and others using phrases like "suck it up." And in the meantime, a certain amount of straightforward anti-semitic content, and now someone went ahead and called someone else a kike. Anonymously, of course.

And I want to say that I'm surprised, and that I really don't think one thing led to the next, except that really, I wasn't, and really I do. And if you feel insulted by that, and think I'm calling you an anti-semite, maybe you should defriend me. Seriously. If you can't look at a post like this one, and see why the comments quoted are insulting and offensive... if you can't say "that was wrong," full stop, if you have to say, "that was wrong, but..." then you should defriend me.

I honestly don't care what kind of history you have with any of the people involved. This is about your history with me.

I'm thinking of a comment [livejournal.com profile] chopchica made on [livejournal.com profile] untrue_accounts' extremely sensible post on the original, [livejournal.com profile] yuletide issue, about how nervous Jews often are about posting on this issue, especially perhaps in contexts in which we're otherwise happy and secure, like fandom. We don't want to rock the boat. We don't want to find out what's lurking under the water. We don't want some anonymous fucktard to come along and call us a kike.

I understand that fear -- I mean, hey, it is my own fear! -- and at least in my part, it's based in distrust: my distrust of you, a group of people I know well and like very much. And you know, I don't want to distrust you. I don't want to feel like I can't speak my mind, or say that something makes me feel uncomfortable or excluded. I don't want to worry about what will happen if I seem too Jewish. I'm not too Jewish. I'm Jewish.

I'm really, really tempted to add, as a final line, "Suck it up," but I guess it would be hypocritical.
vaznetti: (A Russian Thing)
I was going to post about my response to [livejournal.com profile] ibarw (International Blog Against Racism Week; visit the comm for links and discussion), and kept putting it off, because I get the sense that people's feelings are still rather raw, and goodness knows we don't need another round of "those Italians/Hungarians/Russians/Protestants/whatevers beat up my grandparents!" I think that IBARW is a good and useful thing, irrespective of how it makes me feel.

Now I'm in the situation where I think I ought to speak up about that. This is in response to a chain of posts which have something to do with that thing about bands playing gay on stage which (a) I do not know anything about and (b) I do not care anything about. As far as I'm concerned, what I'm talking about starts here, with a comment which I am going to come out and say is anti-semitic. [livejournal.com profile] chopchica, who I do not know at all, responds here. And finally [livejournal.com profile] technosage examined her own discomfort with discussions of antisemitism here.

Under the cut I talk about antisemitism and racism. There is political content. I also talk about IBARW. That's all the warning you get. )
vaznetti: (girls)
Today is Yom haShoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day), and one of the things the AJC does to commemorate it is a reading of names -- I'm sure there's a technical term for this, but can't think what it is -- so I was out in the cold and wind to read for them this afternoon. It was just a fifteen minute slot, but I got the list with the children on it, so it was fifteen minutes of "Name, from Place, killed at Place in Year, age X," with the ages ranging from 1 to 17. Whole families, and a lot of them at places like Auschwitz and Treblinka -- and imagine keeping a child of one or two alive the whole way on the train, only to have him or her killed on arrival -- but also, all the deaths in 1941 when the German army was moving through the Soviet Union, killing as they went.

Halfway through it started to rain, but as the organizer pointed out, they were killed no matter the weather, so we read their names come rain or shine. Or, apparently, hail.
vaznetti: (Pembleton)
Some days, I really love my people. The (Conservative) Rabinnical Assembly has just decided to allow the ordination of gay rabbis and the celebration of same-sex "commitment ceremonies." Maybe. It really depends on how you define the word "decision." As the New York Times puts it:

...in a reflection of the divisions in the movement, the 25 rabbis on the law committee passed three conflicting legal opinions — one in favor of gay rabbis and unions, and two against. In doing so, the committee left it up to individual synagogues to decide whether to accept or reject gay rabbis and commitment ceremonies, saying that either course is justified according to Jewish law.

Either course is justified according to Jewish law! That's hysterical! That's so typical of the Conservative movement! What makes this especially good is that it's taken the committe something like fifteen years to produce this ruling, and in the end all they can manage is "Maybe. If you want."
vaznetti: (jack)
::takes a deep breath::

I've been talking about religion off and on with various people on livejournal over the past few days, and "listening" to other livejournal conversations on the subject. Then, earlier today had an encounter with a Well-Meaning Proselyte. Well-Meaning in the sense that I don't think she was trying to offend me, and I decided not to be offended by it.

One of the things that struck me as I read was the difficulty of certain Christians in understanding why others can find proselytism offensive; equally, it seems to me that just saying, "Why can't you see that it's offensive?" doesn't get us anywhere. So here an attempt to explain why I find Christian proselytes offensive in principle, rather than annoying. This may just be me, of course; other people, Jewish, atheist, pagan, whatever, may well read this and think, "Nope, that's just her. What a nut!"

But here's how I see it )

So. Crazy? Incoherent? Offensive? I leave that to the rest of you.

Religion

Sep. 26th, 2004 10:01 am
vaznetti: (girls)
I love Yom Kippur in the way I imagine some runners must love marathons--not just for the sense of satisfaction in completing something difficult, but also the extended moments of joy in the doing of it. Process and result. You wouldn't want to do it every weekend, but you still want to do it.

But even people who run marathons must have their favorites--the years everything goes perfectly, the courses which just seem to suit them. This was not one of those. cut for religious meandering, possibly incomprehensible to non-Jews )

Final score: 7/10. And now I must start typing up my lectures.

Profile

vaznetti: (Default)
vaznetti

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728 293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 04:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios